Difference between revisions of "Sega v Computer Video Services"
From Sega Retro
(Created page with "{{LawsuitBob | image=Courtseal_GB_HighCourtofJustice.png | title=''Sega Enterprises Inc. v Computer Video Services Ltd.'' | court=wikipedia:High Court of Justice|High Court...") |
m |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
==History== | ==History== | ||
| − | ==Results== | + | ===Results=== |
In December 1981, [[David Rosen]] mentioned that [[Sega]] had successfully taken legal action against Computer Video Services.{{fileref|CashBox US 1981-12-12.pdf|page=45}} | In December 1981, [[David Rosen]] mentioned that [[Sega]] had successfully taken legal action against Computer Video Services.{{fileref|CashBox US 1981-12-12.pdf|page=45}} | ||
Revision as of 03:25, 1 March 2024
|
| Sega Enterprises Inc. v Computer Video Services Ltd. |
|---|
| Court: High Court of Justice[1] |
| Argued: 198x[2] |
| Decided: 198x[2] |
| Holding |
| The court held that Computer Video Services' manufacturing and sale of an unnamed Frogger clone infringed upon the rights of Sega Enterprises, Inc.[1] |
This teeny-tiny article needs some work. You can help us by expanding it.
Sega Enterprises Inc. v Computer Video Services Ltd. is a 198x case in which Sega Enterprises sued Computer Video Services, an English video game manufacturer[1] which distributed an unnamed Frogger clone.[2]
History
Results
In December 1981, David Rosen mentioned that Sega had successfully taken legal action against Computer Video Services.[2]
Magazine articles
- Main article: Sega v Computer Video Services/Magazine articles.