Difference between revisions of "Sega v Computer Video Services"
From Sega Retro
m |
m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{LawsuitBob | {{LawsuitBob | ||
| image=Courtseal_GB_HighCourtofJustice.png | | image=Courtseal_GB_HighCourtofJustice.png | ||
| − | | title=''Sega Enterprises Inc. v Computer Video Services Ltd.'' | + | | title=''Sega Enterprises, Inc. v Computer Video Services, Ltd.'' |
| court=[[wikipedia:High Court of Justice|High Court of Justice]]{{ref|1=https://archive.org/details/play-meter-volume-8-number-2-january-15th-1982/Play%20Meter%20-%20Volume%208%2C%20Number%202%20-%20January%2015th%201982/page/52/mode/2up?q=sega&view=theater}} | | court=[[wikipedia:High Court of Justice|High Court of Justice]]{{ref|1=https://archive.org/details/play-meter-volume-8-number-2-january-15th-1982/Play%20Meter%20-%20Volume%208%2C%20Number%202%20-%20January%2015th%201982/page/52/mode/2up?q=sega&view=theater}} | ||
| argued=198x{{fileref|CashBox US 1981-12-12.pdf|page=45}} | | argued=198x{{fileref|CashBox US 1981-12-12.pdf|page=45}} | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| holding=The court held that Computer Video Services' manufacturing and sale of an unnamed ''[[Frogger]]'' clone infringed upon the rights of [[Sega Enterprises, Inc.]]{{ref|1=https://archive.org/details/play-meter-volume-8-number-2-january-15th-1982/Play%20Meter%20-%20Volume%208%2C%20Number%202%20-%20January%2015th%201982/page/52/mode/2up?q=sega&view=theater}} | | holding=The court held that Computer Video Services' manufacturing and sale of an unnamed ''[[Frogger]]'' clone infringed upon the rights of [[Sega Enterprises, Inc.]]{{ref|1=https://archive.org/details/play-meter-volume-8-number-2-january-15th-1982/Play%20Meter%20-%20Volume%208%2C%20Number%202%20-%20January%2015th%201982/page/52/mode/2up?q=sega&view=theater}} | ||
}} | }} | ||
| − | {{sub-stub}}'''''Sega Enterprises Inc. v Computer Video Services Ltd.''''' is a 198x case in which [[Sega Enterprises]] sued Computer Video Services, an English video game manufacturer{{ref|1=https://archive.org/details/play-meter-volume-8-number-2-january-15th-1982/Play%20Meter%20-%20Volume%208%2C%20Number%202%20-%20January%2015th%201982/page/52/mode/2up?q=sega&view=theater}} which distributed an unnamed ''[[Frogger]]'' clone.{{fileref|CashBox US 1981-12-12.pdf|page=45}} | + | {{sub-stub}}'''''Sega Enterprises, Inc. v Computer Video Services, Ltd.''''' is a 198x case in which [[Sega Enterprises]] sued Computer Video Services, an English video game manufacturer{{ref|1=https://archive.org/details/play-meter-volume-8-number-2-january-15th-1982/Play%20Meter%20-%20Volume%208%2C%20Number%202%20-%20January%2015th%201982/page/52/mode/2up?q=sega&view=theater}} which distributed an unnamed ''[[Frogger]]'' clone.{{fileref|CashBox US 1981-12-12.pdf|page=45}} |
==History== | ==History== | ||
Latest revision as of 03:38, 1 March 2024
|
| Sega Enterprises, Inc. v Computer Video Services, Ltd. |
|---|
| Court: High Court of Justice[1] |
| Argued: 198x[2] |
| Decided: 198x[2] |
| Holding |
| The court held that Computer Video Services' manufacturing and sale of an unnamed Frogger clone infringed upon the rights of Sega Enterprises, Inc.[1] |
This teeny-tiny article needs some work. You can help us by expanding it.
Sega Enterprises, Inc. v Computer Video Services, Ltd. is a 198x case in which Sega Enterprises sued Computer Video Services, an English video game manufacturer[1] which distributed an unnamed Frogger clone.[2]
History
Results
In December 1981, David Rosen mentioned that Sega had successfully taken legal action against Computer Video Services.[2]
Magazine articles
- Main article: Sega v Computer Video Services/Magazine articles.